Process Technology Evaluation and Assessment
PRINT PDF VERSION HERE
Overview
Often, companies in the process industries need impartial evaluations of process
technologies for making strategic and tactical business decisions. Some of the
situations that force this need include. outside technology acquisition
(licensing), benchmarking internal technology developments, screening toll
manufacturers, assessing scale-up potential and risk, and process selection for
projects. Using the experience of our staff of senior process engineers and
dynamic process simulation capability, ioMosaic Corporation provides
comprehensive process evaluation solutions. Typical evaluation criteria we
employ are list below:
Technology Robustness
Robustness addresses process vulnerabilities to the variations and conditions
encountered in a real processing environment. For catalyst promoted processes,
the effect of fluctuations in raw material quality (composition, purity, and
dryness) on yield, selectivity and life is of significance. Other process
issues that can cause process upsets and loss of production include, propensity
for equipment fouling and wear, foaming, corrosiveness of process materials,
and extreme temperature, pressure and humidity conditions to name a few.
Through prior experience and facilitation of process hazard analyses, our
engineers have gained valuable insights on the design and operability issues of
many processes.
Quite often a new technology has attractive advantages over competing processes
on-paper, but has only been operated at pilot plant scale or there is limited
commercial scale experience. In which case, catalyst and equipment performance
data for extended continuous operation is unavailable. We utilize our
engineering staff's process development experience coupled with knowledge of
the potential vulnerabilities of the process steps to weigh the risk of
unproven technologies.
Scale-Up
Scale of operation becomes an issue when the process under consideration has not
been operated at the capacity required for a new project. For commercialized
processes, this may result in exceeding the size of existing single train
equipment such as compressors. For developmental processes, another issue is
how will process performance be affected by scale-up to a much larger scale.
Not all process parameters will scale linearly. In addition, for batch
chemistry, the runaway and decomposition reaction hazards are generally
exacerbated at large scale. ioMosaic is the developer of sophisticated
simulation software for evaluating scale-up problems. Our SuperChems TM
computer program is a dynamic simulator capable of characterizing reaction
kinetics and thermodynamics of scaled-up systems based on thermochemical test
data.
Operability / Maintainability
Electrochemical processes such as used for caustic/chlorine and aluminum
production require periodic tear-down and rebuilding of the electrolytic cells.
Cracking and catalytic dehydrogenation process for olefins production require
frequent decoking of furnace tubes or catalyst beds. Processes that need more
operator/maintenance intervention are more vulnerable to unscheduled outages
and will generally require more staffing and maintenance resources than process
which are more forgiving (e.g., less fouling or less aggressive on equipment).
Our engineers have experience in preparing
reliability/availability/maintainability (RAM) studies that allow
quantification of the expected up time and annual production capacity of
process design configurations.
Process Economics
If done properly, this is usually the equalizing factor that accounts for all
the known and suspected items that affect the processing costs. For
developmental processes this may require independent estimates of raw material,
catalyst, and utility consumptions based on knowledge of the chemistry and
thermodynamics of the process. Our engineers have considerable experience in
preparing manufacturing cost structures for a large range of chemical and
refinery processes.
Process Simulation Studies
Maintaining up-to-date, accurate process simulation data is paramount to the
safe, efficient operation of a plant and is a valuable aid to process
optimization. ioMosaic offers our Process Simulation service as a standalone
line of service, as part of an Emergency Relief System (ERS) Design project, or
as part of our Process Technology Evaluation and Assessment services.
ioMosaic is able to combine the use of their leading edge ERS and dynamic
simulation computer program SuperChems ™ , together with the industry standard
process simulation tool, HYSYS ® , to offer this complete service.
Using our considerable process expertise gained in the petrochemical, chemical,
and pharmaceutical industries, ioMosaic can include the following as part of
our Process Simulation studies:
-
Development of Heat and Material Balances, For Existing Operations
-
Sensitivity Analyses to Identify the Optimal Design Based on Operating and
Business Targets
-
Assessment of Equipment Deficiencies, Such As Heat Exchanger Fouling, and
Column Flooding
-
Equipment Sizing Verification, and Recommendation
-
Evaluation of Feed Changes, Upsets, and Equipment Downtime
Licensing Considerations
Sometimes the deal maker or deal breaker is the licensing arrangement. Some important
aspects are as follows:
-
Company Experience and Credibility (Will They Be In Business As Long As You
Will?)
-
Technical Support Capability (Are They Convincing Regarding Technical Issues?)
-
Licensing Terms (What's Included In The Base License and What Is Extra
Requiring Annual Fees?)
ioMosaic Experience
Our senior process engineers have over 30 years of hands-on process engineering
design and chemical plant operating experience through current assignments and
prior employment at world-class engineering design and chemical manufacturing
companies. In addition, they have conducted many process evaluations for
process industry clients including Air Products, BOC, FMC, GM, Sunoco, and TVA.
A firm was planning to expand its sourcing of nitrogen trifluoride for supplying
the semiconductor industry. Our engineers conducted a process evaluation of
alternative technologies for manufacture of NF 3, of which one was
developmental. The analysis included pro forma manufacturing cost estimates as
well as a rating on technical and commercial factors.
On another assignment, our engineers reviewed the technical and operating
capabilities and safety programs of a toll manufacturing company for a firm
interested in outsourcing the production of a key chemical.